Skip to main content

Paystand: ar automation software platform

Paystand publishes no price. Checked 16 October 2026, its pricing page explains the model, a flat monthly subscription with zero transaction fees on its own network, then asks for a customized ROI analysis instead of showing a rate card. Buy it to move payers off cards. Skip it if your customers will not switch rails.

Rajat GuptaEditorial LeadReviewed 16 October 2026Pricing checked 16 October 2026 against the Paystand pricing page

Paystand in brief

Paystand publishes no price.

Price
None, quote only · Flat monthly subscription with zero transaction fees on the Paystand B2B Network
Best for
B2B suppliers cutting payment processing cost, not collector workload
Watch out for
You give up the ability to check the quote against anything.

The short answer

Buy Paystand if your receivables cost is dominated by card and processing fees rather than by collector time, and you have enough commercial pull with your customers to move them onto a bank-to-bank rail. The commercial argument is a flat monthly subscription in place of a percentage of volume, so the faster your volume grows, the better the swap looks. It fits best on NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics 365, Acumatica or Xero, where the ERP integrations are native.

Skip it if your payers will not change how they pay you. Zero-fee applies to the Paystand B2B Network, and everything else runs on what the page calls pre-negotiated wholesale rates with no figures attached, so a customer base that insists on credit cards leaves you paying a subscription and processing fees. Skip it too if you need a published price before a sales call, or if your acute problem is collector workload rather than fee leakage.

Where Paystand fits

Paystand is a payments company that sells receivables software, and the order of those two things explains everything about where it fits. The pitch is Payments-as-a-Service: a subscription-based payment platform with zero transaction fees on the Paystand B2B Network, its own bank-to-bank rail, built on what the company calls USDb, a digital dollar for business. Collections automation, a payment portal, automatic reconciliation and billing all sit on top. If you describe your AR problem as "we pay too much to get paid", this is the vendor built for that sentence.

The economics only work if your payers move. Paystand's own framing is honest about this, calling the shift a journey and offering legacy acceptance in the meantime: credit cards, digital check, ACH and EFT at rates the page describes as pre-negotiated wholesale, with no figures published. So the real question in evaluation is not whether zero-fee works, it is what share of your receivables you can realistically migrate onto the network in year one. A supplier with a concentrated customer base and some negotiating room can answer that. A business invoicing thousands of small accounts probably cannot.

There is a second lever that shapes the business case and deserves scrutiny: convenience fees and incentives. Paystand lists them as a product capability, which means part of the savings model can involve your customers absorbing a fee for choosing an expensive rail, or receiving an incentive for choosing a cheap one. That is legitimate and it is also a commercial and legal decision rather than a software setting. Check your customer contracts and your state rules before anyone builds it into a projection.

Scope has widened well beyond receivables, and that changes who the buyer is. The platform now spans AR and payments, expense management with corporate cards and spend analytics, payables with AP automation and cross-border payments, and Canadian EFT alongside US rails. Smart Lockbox and Check Scan handle the paper that has not died yet. For a CFO consolidating vendors that breadth is the argument; for an AR manager with one problem it is scope you will pay for and not use, which is why the quote should be itemised by module.

Fit on your ERP is the practical gate. Paystand lists native integrations with NetSuite, Sage Intacct and the wider Sage range, Dynamics 365, Acumatica and Xero, plus commerce platforms including Adobe Commerce, BigCommerce and WooCommerce, and QuickBooks Online on the expense side. If your system of record is on that list, the reconciliation story is credible out of the box. If it is not, the integration work becomes a project with a cost that is not on any published page, and it belongs in the quote rather than in a later change order.

Paystand pricing

Paystand publishes no prices. Checked on 16 October 2026, the pricing page describes the model rather than the cost: a subscription-based platform with zero transaction fees on the Paystand B2B Network, a flat monthly rate rather than a percentage of volume, and a call to action asking for a customized ROI analysis. There is no monthly figure, no per-transaction rate and no published wholesale schedule, so every number in your business case comes out of a sales conversation. The useful work is pinning down what the quote is made of.

Four things set the number, and the first is the one the page sells hardest without pricing.

  1. The flat monthly rate itself. Paystand's model is a subscription, not a transaction fee, and it says you pay a flat monthly rate rather than a percentage of volume. No figure is published for it, so ask for the monthly amount and the contract term before you spend time on the ROI model. A fixed fee is only cheaper than percentage pricing above a certain volume, and you cannot find that break-even without the fee.
  2. Your payment mix, because that is where cost survives the subscription. Transfers on the Paystand B2B Network are described as zero-fee bank-to-bank. Credit cards, digital check, ACH and EFT are accepted at pre-negotiated wholesale rates with no figures attached. Get those rails priced in basis points and per-transaction terms, and model them against the share of volume you honestly expect to leave on cards in year one.
  3. Which modules you are buying. The platform spans receivables, B2B payments, expense management with corporate cards, and payables with cross-border payments, and the site presents all of it as one network. Ask which of those the monthly rate covers and what each additional module adds, so you can start on receivables without paying for spend management you have not scoped.
  4. Your current cost base, because that is the real negotiation. Paystand states that its average user reduces their cost to transact by 49%, a vendor claim rather than a verified figure, and the whole commercial case is framed as a comparison with what you pay today. Bring your current merchant statement and fee schedule to the ROI conversation. Without it you are negotiating against the vendor's benchmark instead of your own numbers.

What costs extra

  • No add-on prices are published. Expense management, corporate cards, AP automation, cross-border payments, Smart Lockbox and Check Scan are listed as parts of the platform with no separate figure against any of them.
  • Legacy card and ACH acceptance is the cost that persists after the subscription. The page calls those rates pre-negotiated wholesale and publishes none of them, so treat processing as an unpriced line until you have it in writing.
  • Implementation and ERP integration carry no published fee. If your system of record is outside the listed integrations, ask for the integration scoped in days and rates alongside the subscription.

Implementation and commercial terms

The rows below are what the Paystand pricing page and its own product pages confirm as of 16 October 2026. Every absence is a question for sales, not a reassurance.

Published price
None. The pricing page describes the model and asks for a customized ROI analysis.
Pricing model
Flat monthly subscription, described as Payments-as-a-Service, with zero transaction fees on the Paystand B2B Network.
Legacy rails
Credit cards, digital check, ACH and EFT at what the page calls pre-negotiated wholesale rates. No figures published.
Implementation fee
None published.
Free trial
None listed. The page offers a customized ROI analysis instead.
Geography
United States nationwide and Canada with localised capability including CAD EFT and cross-border support, per Paystand's own pages.

Budget Paystand as two numbers, not one: the flat monthly subscription, and the processing you will still pay on the share of volume that stays on cards and ACH. Neither is published, so ask for both in the same document, with the wholesale rates expressed per rail rather than as a promise of transparency. Then build your own model rather than accepting the ROI analysis as given, using your current fee schedule as the baseline and a conservative migration assumption for the network. Because nothing here is published, the only honest comparison is against vendors whose prices you can read today, so put Chaser's published rate card and Kolleno's per-user prices next to your quote. They solve a narrower problem, which is the point of the comparison.

Source: the Paystand pricing page, checked 16 October 2026. Confirm current prices with the vendor before you budget.

What Paystand gives up

You give up the ability to check the quote against anything. With no monthly figure and no published wholesale schedule, you cannot tell whether your number is the standard one, whether a comparable business paid less, or whether a renewal uplift is reasonable. The remedy is a competitive process where two quotes discipline each other, which costs evaluation time. Ask for multi-year discount terms and exit terms at the same time, because both are easier to win before you are a reference customer.

You give up control of the savings case, because it depends on your customers rather than on you. Zero-fee applies to Paystand's own network, so the benefit arrives only as payers migrate onto it. Every account that stays on a credit card keeps paying processing on top of your subscription. Model the pessimistic migration case explicitly, and ask what the total cost looks like if most of your payers never move.

You give up a narrow product. Receivables now sits inside a platform that also sells expense management, corporate cards, AP automation and cross-border payments, and the sales conversation is organised around the network rather than the module. If your brief is to fix collections workload, you are buying a payments platform to solve a people problem, and a collections-first tool will do more of what you asked for less commercial complexity.

You give up clean separation between software and money movement. When the vendor is also the payment network, switching costs compound: changing software later means re-papering how your customers pay you, re-onboarding them onto a different portal and unpicking reconciliation rules. Ask what happens to in-flight payments, stored payment methods and the payer portal if you leave, and get the data export rights for the AR records in writing.

You give up a self-serve evaluation. There is no free trial listed; the route in is Talk to an Expert, a demo and the ROI analysis. The dollar amounts you see on the site sit inside a savings calculator and product screenshots, and none of them is a price, so do not carry them into a comparison. Treat the first two calls as the evaluation: one to see the payer experience and reconciliation working, one to extract the commercial terms.

How Paystand compares

In AR automation the dividing line is whether a vendor publishes anything, and in payments-led AR it is also whether the software and the money movement come from the same company. Chaser publishes a full rate card. Paystand, Versapay and Billtrust publish nothing, and the first two also want your payment processing. Every price below comes from that vendor's own pricing page, checked on 16 October 2026, and anything unpublished is recorded as unpublished rather than estimated.

ToolBest forPriceWhere it breaks
PaystandSuppliers whose AR cost is processing fees, with the pull to move payers onto a bank-to-bank networkNot published, quote onlyZero-fee applies only to its own network, and legacy card and ACH rates are unpublished
VersapayTeams wanting a collaborative AR portal with ERP-embedded B2B payments alongside itNot published, quote onlyNo pricing page at all, and the software fee and processing fees are separate conversations
BilltrustEnterprises buying invoicing, payments, credit, collections and cash application as connected modulesNot published, quote onlyNo pricing page, and module-by-module scope is where most of the cost hides
ChaserCollections-first teams that want a published price and tiers set by annual revenueFrom $259, $779 and $1169 per monthNo payment network of its own, and the managed service is a second price layer

What to test in a Paystand demo

No free trial is listed, so this is a demo plus a commercial interrogation. Weight the second half heavily: the product claims are checkable in an hour, while the economics depend on two unpublished numbers and one assumption about your customers.

  1. Get the flat monthly rate and the term in the first or second call, before the ROI model. The page sells a fixed monthly fee and publishes none, so until you have it there is no break-even to calculate. Ask what the rate is a function of, whether it steps with volume or modules, and what the renewal uplift looks like.
  2. Make them price the legacy rails in writing. Credit card, digital check, ACH and EFT acceptance is described as pre-negotiated wholesale with no figures. Ask for basis points and per-transaction fees per rail, plus any monthly minimums, and compare them against your current merchant statement line by line.
  3. Test the payer experience with a real customer's requirements, not a demo account. Walk the payment portal, the network enrolment step and the convenience fee or incentive logic, then ask what percentage of a comparable customer's payers enrolled in the first year. Your own answer to that question is the single biggest variable in the business case.
  4. Push a messy reconciliation through your own ERP. Bring a part payment, a payment covering several invoices and a remittance that arrives separately, run them through automatic reconciliation into NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics 365, Acumatica or Xero, then verify the postings in the ledger yourself rather than on the Paystand dashboard.
  5. Separate the modules and settle the exit terms. Ask for receivables priced on its own, then expense management, corporate cards, AP automation and cross-border payments as separate lines, so you can phase a rollout. In the same conversation, establish who owns the payer relationships and stored payment methods, what happens to in-flight payments if you leave, and what your data export rights are for invoices and payment history.

Frequently asked questions about Paystand

How much does Paystand cost?

Paystand publishes no prices. As of 16 October 2026 its pricing page describes a subscription-based platform with a flat monthly rate and zero transaction fees on its own network, then asks for a customized ROI analysis. The monthly figure and the card and ACH rates all come from the quote.

Does Paystand really charge no transaction fees?

Zero-fee applies to payments on the Paystand B2B Network, its bank-to-bank rail. Credit cards, digital check, ACH and EFT are accepted at rates the pricing page calls pre-negotiated wholesale, and none of those figures is published. So fees persist on whatever share of your volume stays on legacy rails.

What does Paystand do?

Paystand runs a B2B payment network with receivables software on top. It covers collections automation, a customer payment portal, automatic reconciliation, billing and dashboards, plus expense management with corporate cards and payables including cross-border payments, with payments moving on its own rail rather than a third-party processor's.

Is Paystand a payment processor or AR software?

Both, and that is the point of the model. Paystand calls it Payments-as-a-Service: you subscribe to the software and the money moves across the network Paystand operates. That bundling is what lets it charge a flat monthly rate rather than a percentage of volume, and it also raises your switching cost later.

Which ERPs does Paystand integrate with?

Paystand lists native integrations with NetSuite, Sage Intacct and the wider Sage range, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Acumatica and Xero, with QuickBooks Online on the expense side. Commerce integrations include Adobe Commerce, BigCommerce and WooCommerce. If your system of record is not listed, price the integration work inside the quote.

What is USDb?

USDb is Paystand's digital dollar for business, the instrument its network uses to move funds. Paystand describes same-day transfers with business context and compliance carried in the payment, built on blockchain infrastructure. Treat it as the rail your payers are being asked to adopt, and test enrolment before you model savings.

Who pays convenience fees with Paystand?

That is a commercial decision, not a product default. Paystand lists convenience fees and incentives as a capability, so part of the savings model can involve payers absorbing a fee for expensive rails or getting an incentive for cheap ones. Check your customer contracts and state rules before anyone assumes it.

Does Paystand offer a free trial?

No free trial is listed. The pricing page offers a customized ROI analysis and the site routes buyers to Talk to an Expert or a demo. Dollar figures shown on the site sit inside a savings calculator and product screenshots, so none of them is a price to carry into a comparison.

Where does Paystand operate?

Paystand says it is headquartered in California and operates nationwide across all 50 US states, with Canadian operations supported through localised capability including CAD EFT and cross-border support. Payables adds cross-border payments. If you invoice outside North America, ask which rails and currencies are actually live.

How does Paystand compare with a card processor?

By pricing basis. A processor charges a percentage of volume, while Paystand charges a flat monthly subscription and argues fixed cost beats percentage cost as you grow. It claims the average user cuts cost to transact by 49%, a vendor figure, but publishes no monthly price to test that against.